Solutions · Code Generation

Hand-Written Flight Code Is Slow to Verify and Hard to Trust

Hand-Written Flight Code Is Slow to Verify and Hard to Trust

Mission-critical systems demand deterministic, trusted and verified code. Manual coding is slow to verify, traceability is rebuilt by hand, and probabilistic code generators can’t be trusted with flight software.

+

+

+

+

TODAY / REQUIREMENTS → FLIGHT CODE

● BLOCKED

Requirements approved

The specification is ready for implementation

REQS

Drivers written by hand

Per component, per platform, per bus

MANUAL

Every line verified by review

Slow to verify for mission-critical software

SLOW

Traceability rebuilt by hand

Code to requirement to ICD, kept in documents

MANUAL

AI assistants guess

Probabilistic output can’t be trusted for flight

UNTRUSTED

01 — THE PROBLEM

Why Flight Code Takes So Long

Why Flight Code Takes So Long

Requirements are approved, but drivers and application layers are still written, reviewed and traced by hand, one component at a time.

+

+

+

+

01

Manual coding is slow to verify

Manual coding is slow to verify

Drivers and application layers are written by hand for every component and platform, then reviewed line by line before they can fly.

+

+

+

+

02

Probabilistic code can’t fly

Probabilistic code can’t fly

Generic AI code assistants guess. Mission-critical systems demand deterministic, trusted and verified code.

+

+

+

+

03

Traceability is rebuilt by hand

Traceability is rebuilt by hand

Mapping every function back to its requirement and ICD revision is manual work that drifts with each change.

02 — THE SOLUTION

Traceable, Flight-Ready Code Generation

Traceable, Flight-Ready Code Generation

Lynapse™ Studio generates source code directly from engineer-approved requirements and the digital model. We do not use probabilistic models for critical flight code.

+

+

+

+

01

Deterministic Generation

Deterministic Generation

We do not guess. We generate platform-agnostic, FSW-agnostic source code directly from verified requirements.

+

+

+

+

02

Integration Ready

Integration Ready

Ready for seamless integration into your flight software stack, OS and bus library agnostic.

+

+

+

+

03

Direct Traceability

Direct Traceability

Every line of generated code is mapped to its parent engineer-approved requirement.

MISRA C:2012

C99

C++11

RTOS / Bare-metal MCU

MPU / Linux

Versioned in Git

03 — TRACEABILITY

Generated Code, Traced to the Model

Generated Code, Traced to the Model

Generated output is pre-configured by your FSW engineers and stamped with its component, ICD version, requirements revision, model version and target hardware platform.

+

+

+

+

BUILD STAMP

COMPONENT

RW_UNIT

ICD

v18

REQUIREMENTS

rev C

MODEL

v12

TARGET

Cortex-M · RTOS

rw_unit_driver.c · MISRA C:2012 · C99

/* Generated by Lynapse™ Studio · MISRA C:2012 · C99

* component: RW_UNIT icd: v18

* reqs: rev C model: v12

* target: Cortex-M · RTOS */

/* @req REQ-FSW-041 · Set wheel speed setpoint */

rw_status_t rw_set_speed(rw_id_t id, int32_t rpm) {

rw_status_t st = RW_ERR_RANGE;

if ((rpm >= RW_RPM_MIN) && (rpm <= RW_RPM_MAX)) {

st = rw_bus_send(id, RW_CMD_SET_SPEED, rpm);

}

return st;

}

Illustrative example. IDs, values and code are invented.

+

+

+

+

Built for high stakes

Flight-Ready Code, Traced to Every Requirement

Flight-Ready Code, Traced to Every Requirement

Early-access trial seats for Lynapse™ Studio are limited. Seats are offered first come, first served. Request access now and tell us what you’re integrating.

Prefer to talk first?

Book a demo